Contributed by Andrew Hutchinson
The 2014 World Crokinole Championship has come and gone, and this year the name of the game was parity. In both cues singles and doubles, there was little room separating the victors from their opponents. Furthermore, this year saw a
mixture of the
“new and the old” taking home the money.
The 2014 World Crokinole Championship has come and gone, and this year the name of the game was parity. In both cues singles and doubles, there was little room separating the victors from their opponents. Furthermore, this year saw a
The trophies for the 2014 World Crokinole Champions. Photo Credit: 104.7 Heart FM |
Cues Doubles
The morning
began with 24 cues doubles pairs facing off with the hopes of landing in the
top 6 to reach the A Division finals.
Each pairing only played 6 games each in the preliminary round, making
the opponents that you draw all the more crucial. When all was said and done, Andrew Hutchinson
and David King took advantage of a relatively light draw to finish the first
round in first place, with a total of 37 out of a possible 48 points. Stalwarts Wayne Schultz and Floyd Kuepfer and
husband-and-wife duo Merv and Marjorie Roth finished a point behind with 36
points each. Ernie Martin and Maurice
Sauder finished tied with the Brubacher brothers, Dennis and Dave, with 34 points
each.
With these five
teams comfortably in the A Division finals, one spot remained: three teams were
tied with 30 points apiece, including James and Joseph Ward, the only cues
doubles participants from outside of Canada, Gary Palmer and Sam Moore, last
year’s cues doubles runners up, and Jonathon and Jeremy Brubacher, the
Brubacher cousins with a strong crokinole pedigree. The tie breaker came down to 20’s
accumulated, with the Ward brothers from Ohio coming on top with 59 20’s scored
in the first round.
Also looking in
from the outside of the A Division finals, were some other traditional cues
doubles powers. Last year's fourth place
finishers Wayne Kipfer and Arthur Poole finished with 29 points. More shockingly, 3 time (and defending)
champions Lorraine Proud and Carol Litt finished with 28 points. Newcomers on the rise, Doug Schwartzentruber
and Josh Carrafiello finished with 27 points, and Jim Nau and Murray Walker
rounded out the B Division finals.
In the B
Division finals, Proud and Litt took care of business, with the Brubacher
cousins and Kipfer and Poole in hot pursuit.
But everybody’s eyes were on the A Division final, to see who would take
Proud and Litt’s cues doubles crown away.
The A Division draw was full of uncertainty, with no contestant having
ever won a cues doubles championship before.
As the round
robin finals got under way, it became quite clear that there the final draw was
filled with parity – in the end, the top 5 teams were separated by only 6
points. The Brubacher brothers were
barely left on the outside of the money with 18 points. Martin and Sauder earned just enough points,
20, for the fourth place finish. In
third, the Ward brothers came away with 23 points their first time doubling up
together at the World Crokinole Championship.
Finally, both
Schultz and Kuepfer and Hutchinson and King finished with
24 points; like in the fingers doubles event on the other side of the arena,
the championship would be decided by a tie breaker. Schultz/Kuepfer and Hutchinson/King had split
their match in the finals 4-4, thus going to the second tie breaker, 20’s
accumulated. Schultz and Kuepfer
finished with a strong 59, but that proved only enough for 2nd
place, as Hutchinson and King’s strong 20’s showing (64) proved to be the
difference, allowing them to claim their first cues doubles championship!
David King and Andrew Hutchinson 2014 World Cues Doubles Crokinole Champions Photo Credit: Bill Gladding |
Cues Singles
After a close
and intense cues doubles tournament, the competitors had to refocus and prepare
themselves for the cues singles tournament in the afternoon and evening. The question heading in was would some of the
newer faces from the Division A final continue their strong play and make some
more noise, or would some of the “old faithfuls” make a comeback in the singles
event? A gruelling 10 game preliminary
round would help determine the answer of that question.
There were 34
competitors in the cues singles events, meaning the top 16 would make it to the
second round. In addition to seeing who
would advance, the preliminary round would also decide the 20’s champion. Despite the good conditions, no competitor
was able to break the 100 mark, but Dennis Brubacher came close, winning the
20’s title with 95. When all was said
and done, the top 16 players advanced, scoring between 45 and
60 points. Players were broken into the
following divisions for the second round.
A:
Wayne Schultz
Wayne Kipfer
Andrew
Hutchinson
Carol Litt
Lorraine Proud
Paul Weber
James Ward
Lorne Steckley
B:
Jon Brubacher
Carl Litt
David King
Dennis
Brubacher
Murray Kuehl
Ernie Martin
Doug
Schwartzentruber
Arthur Poole
The second
round always proves to be an extremely challenging round, with only the top 2
from each division advancing. At first
glance, the A Division appeared to be an incredibly competitive division, and
it lived up to such hype. Little
separated the top two from the rest of the division, but after the 7 game round
robin, Andrew Hutchinson and Wayne Schultz emerged on top, both with a score of
32 points. However, things could have
gone very differently with James Ward, Wayne Kipfer, Lorraine Proud, and Carol
Litt all within a handful of points away.
The B Division proved to have a little less parity. Carl Litt and Murray Kuehl both comfortably
advanced with scores of 37 and 34.
Others had good showings such as Doug Schwartzentruber, Jon Brubacher, Dennis Brubacher, and
David King, but none were able to get close enough to Litt and Kuehl.
Thus the finals
saw the two most decorated cues singles players (Schultz had 8 top-four
finishes and Litt had 7 heading into this year), and two relative newcomers
(Hutchinson finished 4th last year, Kuehl had never finished
top-four). Furthermore, from last year’s
four finalists, only Hutchinson had reached the top four again. In fact, the champions from the past three
years (Kipfer – 2013, Proud – 2012, 2011) did not make it to the final
four. Coming off of his doubles victory
in the morning, Hutchinson came out hot in the 4 player round robin, winning
each game 6-2, leaving the 3 other competitors fighting for the second spot in
the final. Schultz (11 points) managed to hold off
Litt and Kuehl (10 and 9 respectively) to earn a place in the championship game.
In the 3 vs. 4
game, Litt faced off against his doubles partner of the morning, Kuehl. Despite less experience, however, Kuehl
managed to defeat Litt. Litt however,
could take solace in earning his 8th top-four finish in cues singles
(to go along with 4 top-four finishes in cues doubles).
All the eyes,
however, were focussed on the championship match. Could Hutchinson sweep the singles and
doubles championships? Could Schultz
avenge the tie-breaking loss in the morning’s doubles finals? Schultz was motivated to beat Hutchinson
after having lost 6-2 to him in both the round of 16 and the round of 4. While Hutchinson, knowing that he would be missing
next year’s World Crokinole Championships due to going to Africa to teach this
coming year, was motivated to win his first singles championship.
Wayne Schultz posing with the top 4 cues players at the 2014 World Crokinole Championship. Photo Credit: Bill Gladding |
The finals
would prove to be extremely tight.
Schultz was on top of his game and won the first game by a score of
5-3. The second game was down to the
wire, going to 4-4 before requiring a tie-breaking round. Knowing that missing just one 20 could mean
losing the match, Hutchinson went toe-to-toe with Schultz each scoring a
perfect “six-pack” of 20’s (in cues singles, each player only shoots 6 buttons
per round). They would be forced to play
another round tie-breaker. This time
Hutchinson got up in 20’s early and then played defensively, staying away from
the hole the rest of the round. This
proved successful, allowing Hutchinson to win the second game 7-5: it would go
down to a decisive third game.
Hutchinson, however, was never able to get ahead in the third game,
missing his first 20 and losing the first two rounds to go down 4-0. Entering the third round, Schultz only needed
a single point from a tie to claim the championship. Hutchinson went up a 20 early, but with the
hammer, Schultz was able to tie the game with two of his pieces in the
10-ring. The tie was enough to earn
Schultz his 5th point in the third game, winning himself the
championship!
With the
victory, Schultz earned himself a record 9th top-four finish in cues
singles and also a record 4th cues singles championship. Hutchinson, on the other hand, proved that
last year was not an anomaly, and let the rest of the cues crokinole world know
he will be a force to be reckoned with when he returns from Africa after next
year. This coming year, however, looks
to be just as parity-filled as ever – but we will all have to be patient to see
who emerges victorious in 2015!
Andrew Hutchinson is a competitive cues crokinole player who broke through in 2013 to finish 4th in the singles competition. He can be followed on Twitter in his preparation for the 2014 World Crokinole Tournament at @FavouriteHutch
Andrew Hutchinson is a competitive cues crokinole player who broke through in 2013 to finish 4th in the singles competition. He can be followed on Twitter in his preparation for the 2014 World Crokinole Tournament at @FavouriteHutch
No comments:
Post a Comment